| ||
|
Home
The Editors Links of Interest The Archives |
Crawford, James & Krashen, Stephen. (2007).
English Language Learners in American Classrooms: 101
Questions 101 Answers. NY, NY:
Scholastic.
96 pages English for the Children…What a clever name for a
draconian organization championed by the republican industrialist
Ron Unz in an effort to make English legally the only language
that can be used in public schools. The name of the organization
connotes compassion and beneficence, but such kindness and
concern is hard to swallow when it comes from a self-professed
opponent of bilingual education, Affirmative Action, and
multicultural education. But the deception doesn’t stop there. In 1998 in
California, in 2000 in Arizona, and in 2002 in Massachusetts, Ron
Unz and his organization successfully scapegoated and wiped out
bilingual education in those states, replacing it with a one year
Sheltered Immersion Program. English for the Children is
currently working hard to do the same in other states around the
country. Under Unz's plan, linguistic-minority students only need one
year (about one hundred and eighty school days) to become fully
fluent, literate, and able to learn academic knowledge in another
language. However, there is no defensible theory or body of
research to support this claim. On the contrary, students by the
millions in these three states continue to fall behind in both
their acquisition of English and in the content areas. This is
particularly disconcerting in the age of NCLB and high-stakes
standardized assessment where students have to pass these exams
in English in order to graduate. James Crawford and Stephen Krashen’s new book takes on
and ruptures the myths that are perpetuated about language
acquisition and linguistic-minority communities in the United
States. The book provides a comprehensive overview of the history
of language education in the country, who this student body is,
what type of programs and pedagogical approaches have been
implemented to teach language, the research that exists in this
area, the benefits of long-term multilingualism, and the
criticisms of bilingual education. The book also does a fine job
of examining language service requirements in public schools,
evaluating language acquisition assessment instruments, reviewing
public opinion on bilingual education, and exposing the politics
of language and language policy in the U.S. In addition, it
provides internet resources for those educators and activists
interested in expanding their understanding of these important
issues. What Crawford and Krashen make perfectly clear is that
contrary to Unz's claim that bilingual education has been "a
disastrous experiment" that is backed by no research, there is an
abundance of international studies that clearly shows how when
properly implemented, including the native tongue as part of the
language acquisition process is beneficial. The book is also
helpful in understanding the counter-intuitive logic that quality
education in the first language facilitates the growth of the
target language—the basic principle on which bilingual
education is built: if knowledge is comprehensible in the first
language (e.g., the language of math), then it will be easier to
understand in the second language. Thus, while students are
learning English, educators should be encouraged, rather than
discouraged, to use what they bring to the classroom in an
additive and culturally responsive way to continue their academic
development, and with it the growth of English. The authors of English Learners in American Classrooms
also highlight that bilingual education is not a monolithic
entity and its success or failure as a theory depends entirely on
the people and institutions that bring it to life. They emphasize
that what educators, administrators, parents/care-givers, local
organizations, businesses, and policy makers need to honestly
address is that the majority of linguistic-minority students
reside in low-income, urban areas that have schools that are
highly segregated and in bad shape. Concerned citizens need to
recognize and confront the harsh racist and material
conditions—incessant harassment of children and English as
a second language/bilingual teachers and staff, segregated school
activities, limited classroom materials, teacher attitudes that
belittle students, weak teacher professional development, poorly
designed and unenforced policies, and indifferent
leadership—that dramatically disrupt the academic lives of
these students. Instead of discarding the potential of programs
like bilingual education, the authors point out that this country
needs to discover what ensures that such undertakings don't
succeed. The bottom line is that everyone wants English to be learned
by children and adults. The real question is: What's the most
effective, efficient, culturally responsive and humanizing way to
go about this task. To answer such a complex question the nation
should rely on sound experience, theory, and research. James
Crawford is the president of the Institute for Language and
Education Policy, is a former Washington editor of Education
Week, is a well-known language policy historian, and is the
author of countless books on this issue. Stephen Krashen has a
Ph.D. in linguistics from UCLA and taught in the Linguistics and
Education Departments at USC for almost three decades. He is
widely known for developing a comprehensive theory of second
language acquisition, for being the co-founder of the Natural
Approach that has been implemented in public and private schools
throughout the U.S., and for being the pioneer of sheltered
subject matter teaching—in addition to having researched
these issues and published a great deal in scholarly journals and
with academic presses. As such English Learners in American
Classrooms is a far more informed place to start to educate
oneself about language acquisition policies and practices in the
United States than listening to a savvy politician—a
monolingual, multimillionaire with no children, and with no
background in education or linguistics—who is strategically
vying for misinformed populous clout through theoretical
ambiguities, a disregard for research, and representational
manipulations of what's best for children. Suggested Reading and Resources: Institute for Language and Education Policy: Research-Based Advocacy for Schools and Communities, www.elladvocates.org/index.html Language Policy Web Site & Emporium, ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/JWCrawford/Rethinking School Online, Bilingual Education Resources, www.rethinkingschools.org/special_reports/bilingual/resources.shtml U.S. English Inc.: Towards a United America,
www.us-english.org/ |
|
| |
||